Does rent stabilization = golden handcuffs?
Snagging a rent stabilized or rent controlled apartment is like winning the NYC real estate lottery. As such, rent-regulated tenants usually garner more jealousy than sympathy from their fellow New Yorkers. But one writer over on Thrillist describes a real downside of being a middle class person in a stabilized apartment — a scenario she describes as "golden handcuffs."
Though the writer, Daisy Barringer, is based in San Francisco, her plight sounds pretty familiar to us New Yorkers:
"Giving up my rent-controlled apartment would mean giving up the only thing that allows me to even be able to (barely) afford to live in San Francisco in 2015. That’s right: I can either leave San Francisco permanently. Or I can stay until I die. There isn’t an in between. At least not in this housing market. ... [San Francisco has] has given me an ultimatum: stay together or break up for good. "
Sound familiar?
Barringer says she wishes for a day when the city, which is being filled up with tech millionaires, "will regain some of its more attractive, bohemian qualities. That it will realize it’s meant to be a playground for all people, not just the rich ones." (Sounds familiar.)
In fact, one NYC resident who wrote for us about her life as a 20 percenter in an 80/20 building explained how affordable housing here in the Big Apple isn't without its downsides — she delayed her college graduation and joined the workforce late just to hold onto her affordable housing, and she often feels like a second-class citizen amongst her far more well-off neighbors.
Related:
New Yorkers' biggest misconceptions about rent stabilization
